WOFAPS 2025 8th World Congress of Pediatric Surgery

Elizabeth Brits ¹, Stephen Brown ², Lezelle Botes ³, Joseph Sempa ⁴, Michael Pienaar ⁵

¹ Paediatric Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
² Division of Paediatric Cardiology, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
³ Department of Health Sciences, Central University of Technology, Bloemfontein, South Africa
⁴ Department of Biostatistics, Faculty of Health Science, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
⁵ Division of Critical Care, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa

Background: Biliary atresia (BA) is a severe paediatric liver disease causing cirrhosis without prompt treatment. Aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRi), a non-invasive biomarker, shows promise in assessing fibrosis and cirrhosis severity, offering an alternative to liver biopsy. However, standardised criteria and research on APRi accuracy in paediatric BA, especially across diverse populations, remain limited.

Objectives: To assess the correlation between APRi values, liver fibrosis and cirrhosis severity in children with BA, evaluate APRi's diagnostic accuracy and clinical utility, and identify appropriate cut-off values for significant fibrosis and cirrhosis.

Methods: This systematic review and meta-analysis, conducted per PRISMA guidelines, evaluated non-invasive biomarkers for liver fibrosis in BA patients. Data were managed using REDCap and analysed with R software. Heterogeneity was assessed with the Cochrane Q test and I² values.

Results: Fourteen studies (retrospective, prospective, and one cross-sectional) examined APRi and liver fibrosis in BA. APRi cut-off values for diagnosing fibrosis and cirrhosis ranged from 0.7 to 2.26 for advanced fibrosis (F3). The meta-analysis provided pooled means and 95% confidence intervals for APRi, assessing its diagnostic performance. Significant heterogeneity was noted in studies with favourable histology, while none was observed in those with unfavourable histology, highlighting variability in APRi values.

Conclusion: Limited patient numbers and significant heterogeneity across studies impeded the establishment of a definitive threshold for identifying unfavourable histology in BA. Consequently, APRi's clinical utility remains unclear. Further research is required to determine its precise role as a biopsy surrogate and in clinical decision-making during BA diagnosis.